Defending the Public

Fight the man a little more every day!

Books April 29, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — Salmon Chase @ 9:08 am

When I came to law school, I brought some books. I can’t say I’ve finished all of those, but I’ve bought many more over the past two-and-a-half years. So many, in fact, that when I moved last summer for an internship, I took a big box of books with me, most of which I never read that summer…

I’m reading Nostromo right now.

You know, getting through a few pages each night.  Nostromo isn’t exactly a page-turner, but it’s rather beautifully written.  It’s no Bridge on the Drina, of course.  But, I think I’d rather be re-reading American Psycho or something…

 

Guantánamo April 26, 2007

Filed under: Foreign Affairs, The war of terror — Salmon Chase @ 10:06 am

As if the legal situation at Guantánamo couldn’t get any worse, the DOJ is requesting court approval to further castrate detainee access to defense attorneys.

Among the DOJ proposals:

  • Defense attorneys would be allowed to meet with their clients only three times;
  • Intelligence officers and military lawyers would be allowed to read letters clients write to their attorneys;

And, of course, the U.S. continues to insist that nobody at Guantánamo has a right to an attorney in the first place, so we should be thankful of any concessions made…

See the International Herald Tribune article for the full story.

 

Sometimes you see it coming… April 24, 2007

Filed under: Law School, Public Defenders — Salmon Chase @ 8:41 pm

Sadly, I won’t be working as a post-bar at a particular next-county-over Public Defender’s office - that office seems to have bigger problems to worry about.  So, let’s see - you’re the head of a county’s indigent defense system that is understaffed, plagued with “unbearable caseloads” (ineffective assistance?) and accusations of managerial “incompetence”, causing you to lose veteran DPDs on a regular basis.

The solution: eliminate your post-bar program altogether. After four months of waiting for a definite answer from them, this Public Defender has decided that they’d be better off without summer post-bar interns… apparently nobody from that office read my post about public defender recruitment!

 

Double Jeopardy April 24, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — Salmon Chase @ 8:55 am

*Spoiler alert regarding the film “Fracture“*

I just returned from seeing the new Anthony Hopkins legal-thriller film Fracture.  Despite the fact that I find it to be an absolutely asinine piece of law AND a poorly crafted plot device, I think that the film’s invocation of a particular aspect of double jeopardy was legally correct…

See People v. Harrison, 395 Ill. 463 (1947) (cert. denied); see also Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299 (1932)

Damn you and your legal trickery, Ryan Gosling… Hopkins should have beaten you until the bitter end.  That was definitely the first movie where I’ve rooted for a truly culpable murderer.

 

Marie-Ségolène Royal - “présidentiel” April 22, 2007

Filed under: Foreign Affairs — Salmon Chase @ 5:06 pm

Since I haven’t any public defender thoughts to post at the moment, I thought a mention of the ongoing French presidential elections would be… apropos.

Despite the fact that she’s far from perfect, I think it would be wonderful if Marie-Ségolène Royal manages to emerge victorious - first-round results will be released on Wednesday!

I must say, I think she looks quintessentially French, and she’s definitely the most beautiful 53-year old woman these young eyes have ever seen!

 

Sherri Jefferson (30 days for “contempt”) April 16, 2007

Filed under: Public Defenders — Salmon Chase @ 6:25 pm

Many of you have been following the story of Sherri Jefferson, the GA public defender who was given 30 days for contempt of court. Ms. Jefferson submitted a 17-page letter of resignation shortly before a Georgia appellate court upheld the contempt punishment. Although I haven’t been able to get the actual letter yet, today I received 33 pages of various documents that were attached to that letter of resignation, including:

  • Her affidavit in support of a motion to recuse the original judge (George Rountree) and opposition to contempt allegations;
  • The affidavit of Circuit Defender Grayson P. Lane (apparently an alleged co-contemnor) in support of a motion to recuse Judge Rountree;
  • A letter from Grayson P. Lane to the judge regarding the judge’s complaints about Ms. Jefferson.

These supporting documents paint a troubling picture of the Glynn County Juvenile Court, detailing the court’s consistent failure to provide timely opportunity for determining whether arrestees are eligible for appointed defense counsel; draconian treatment of detained children; and, a great deal of disrespect from both Judge Rountree and Assistant District Attorney Frank Aspinwall being directed toward attorneys from the Circuit Defender in general and Ms. Jefferson in specific.

More details are forthcoming.

 

Recruitment April 12, 2007

Filed under: Law School, Public Defenders — Salmon Chase @ 5:59 am

Just like the military, large legal firms may have high turnover rates and unhappy associates, but one thing they do well is recruitment. They know the types of students they want to recruit and they make an effort to go out and get them. Sadly, this is something that public defense agencies are failing at miserably..

Given the well-deserved reputation for low salary and wholly undeserved reputation for being the last bastion of inept attorneys, public defender offices are already at a disadvantage when it comes to recruitment of law students. Nevertheless, there are still three student demographics that public defense offices appeal to: “true believers,” students looking for quick trial experience, and students who just want to be involved in criminal law in some capacity.

Public defender recruitment should have three steps:

  1. Attract the attention of those students with an interest in public defense (see above categories);
  2. Narrow the recruitment pool down to those students fitting into the “true believer” category;
  3. Apply aptitude and attitude rankings and select candidates from there.

PD offices stumble through the first two steps, and by the time they get to the third, it hardly matters. They’ve already lost many of their best candidates. Current public defender recruitment practices are detrimental all around: would-be public defenders find (or fail to find) work elsewhere; the agencies themselves suffer high turnover rates; and defendants don’t get attorneys as good as the ones they might have received, had the agency recruited effectively.

So, how can PD offices efficiently attract the attention of the appropriate students?

First: Contact each law school’s career services department, provide your office’s information, keep them informed of new job opportunities for both attorneys and interns. This one is a no-brainer.

Second: If there is not already a criminal clinic through each law school, collaborate with the school to build such a program.

Third: Get in touch with each appropriate student group: many schools have chapters of the National Lawyers Guild, the American Association for Justice (formerly ATLA), the American Constitution Society, and similar organizations. Many of your deputy public defenders may be members of these organizations - use this to your advantage by cajoling them into acting as liaisons. Once you’re in touch with these groups, you will want to meet and speak with the student membership - but take it a step further, and actively engage these groups with programming: arrange speaking engagements, happy hours, screenings of films like The Thin Blue Line.

What’s so important about weeding out everyone but the “true believers”?

This part is a matter of using your resources efficiently. Whether you’re hiring attorneys or student interns, your office will (hopefully) be expending a considerable amount of time and money to train them. Do you want to allocate those resources to someone who is planning to take advantage of your office’s training only to leave you in three years for private practice? Or worse, someone who will wind up becoming a DA because they “just want to do criminal law,” and not necessarily defense?

If you’re situated in a major metropolitan area (and I must admit, this blog assumes as much), you should have enough law students to provide you with a sizable potential intern pool - once you select your interns, it is crucial that you establish a mentorship program. Once it’s in place, it really won’t require that much effort from your deputies, but it will aid your recruiting in two distinct ways.

First: It will build personal and emotional connections between your office and each student - few things will make students more interested in working for you.

Second: Your deputy mentors act as individual human resource managers and, in the course of the mentorship, seek to determine whether each student is the type likely to be a good investment for your office. Law students are savvy - they know the “correct” answer to interview questions - so don’t let them fool you. After mentoring them for a semester or longer, your deputies will be in an excellent position to report to you on the true nature of the student they mentored.